Compare your options
Four ways to find the leak
Choose by report size and commitment appetite, not by feature count.
The job to finish
A defensible negative list, monthly.
Define done: every term above your click tolerance with zero orders has been classified as negative, test, or accept-with-reason, and the list is applied.
Four criteria
Coverage, privacy, effort, lock-in.
Coverage: which report format and platform the route can actually read.[1]
Data handling: where the file goes while it is processed.[2]
Effort: raw rows out of a report versus a prioritised, exported list.[3]
Lock-in: what the paid follow-on commits you to.[5]
Conditional fit
Spend bands select the route.
Small accounts: manual review with a saved rule. Medium: the free analyzer monthly, native rules between reviews. Large and steady: the managed platform is priced for it.
The vendor itself floors its human audit at 5,000USD monthly spend, which is honest guidance about where free attention stops.[6]
What is documented and what is not
Tiers are published; method is not.
Platform pricing is published in net EUR with a spend-share element.[4]
The analyzer's risk-tier thresholds and any effectiveness uplift are not documented. Treat tier outputs as proposals to verify against your own order data.
Reversible step
One export, one reconciliation.
Run the analyzer once on last quarter's report, apply nothing, and compare its top tier against your own judgement. That hour settles the buying question.
The shortlist
Compare fit, limits and real cost.
These are conditional options, without a universal winner. Pricing reflects the stated unit and observed date.
Scroll horizontally to compare limits and cost. Keyboard: focus the table and use the arrow keys.
| Approach | Choose when | Avoid when | Cost basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manual negative-keyword hygieneReview the search-term report yourself on a fixed cadence and add zero-order, high-click terms as negatives. | Your catalogue is small enough to audit honestly in an hour a month. | The report is over a few thousand rows and the review keeps slipping. | Confirm cost No extra software cost; count the recurring analyst hours instead. |
| BidX Wasted Ad Spend Analyzer (free)Upload the Amazon search-term report to a browser tool that tiers non-converting terms and exports a negative-keyword CSV. | You want a first pass on a real report in minutes, without sending campaign data to a server. | You need Google Ads or Meta coverage - the analyzer reads Amazon Seller or Vendor report formats only. | Confirm cost The analyzer itself is published as free with no account; the paid platform is a separate decision documented below. |
| BidX managed automation platformConnect the account to BidX's paid automation and advisory tiers. | Ad spend is high enough that an agency-grade service pays for itself and annual commitment is acceptable. | You are below the funnel's own stated engagement floor or you want month-to-month flexibility. | EUR 495 / month Self Service Platform · self-service platform, plus percentage of connected ad spend Annual commitment; the percentage element is quoted per account rather than published as a single rate. Net prices in EUR shown on the pricing page; VAT added. Checked 14 September 2026. Pricing source |
| Amazon's own automation and rulesUse Seller Central bid rules and auto-negatives where available, and let platform automation do the pruning. | You want change-free hygiene without exporting data anywhere. | Your account type or report window does not expose the terms you need. | Confirm cost Included with the advertising account; the cost is configuration time and visibility. |
Manual negative-keyword hygiene: what supports the fit
The underlying rule is simple - clicks without orders above your tolerance become negatives - and a spreadsheet can apply it; the tooling question is about diligence, not secrecy.
BidX Wasted Ad Spend Analyzer (free): what supports the fit
The analyzer's page asks for one input: your uploaded Search Term Report.[1]
The tool page states processing runs entirely in your browser, with nothing sent to a server or stored.[2]
The stated output is an instant, risk-tiered breakdown of terms draining budget, exportable as negatives.[3]
How the risk tiers are calculated - click counts, spend or order windows - is not documented on the tool page. Open the exported CSV and reconcile a sample of flagged terms against your own order window before trusting it wholesale.
We may earn a commission if you buy through this link, at no extra cost to you.
Run the free wasted-spend analyzer (affiliate link)BidX managed automation platform: what supports the fit
The pricing page lists the self-service platform at 495 € plus a percentage of connected ad spend per month.[4]
The same page states all plans are based on an annual commitment with monthly payments.[5]
The free human campaign audit is documented for accounts with a minimum ad spend of 5,000USD per month, which bounds who the funnel serves.[6]
Amazon's own automation and rules: what supports the fit
Native rules apply the same clicks-without-orders logic continuously; compare their thresholds against the tiers in any exported CSV before paying for overlap.
Some vendor links on this page are affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you buy through them, at no extra cost to you. Commercial relationships do not determine our recommendations or ordering. Full disclosure.
The decision
Let your constraints choose the path.
If the negative list has never been reviewed honestly
Run the free analyzer on a 60-90 day report, then reconcile its tiers against your own order window before applying anything.
Keep in mind: Zero orders inside the report window is not proof of a bad keyword; new and test traffic converts late or elsewhere.
If the same terms keep appearing quarter after quarter
Promote a validated rule into native automation so hygiene stops depending on memory.
Keep in mind: Automation inherits whatever threshold you set, including a wrong one.
Sources & research method
Documentation research by Vetted SaaS Blueprint, retrieved on 14 September 2026 from BidX's analyzer, pricing and free-audit pages. Those pages establish the stated input, in-browser processing, tiered output, platform price and spend floors. The tier algorithm and any performance uplift are undocumented and marked unknown. No campaign data was uploaded for this guide and no hands-on test is implied.
Reviewed 14 September 2026. Vendor capabilities and terms can change; check the linked source before committing. No first-hand product test is implied.
- Wasted Ad Spend Analyzer
BidX · Retrieved 14 September 2026
- Wasted Ad Spend Analyzer
BidX · Retrieved 14 September 2026
- Wasted Ad Spend Analyzer
BidX · Retrieved 14 September 2026
- Pricing
BidX · Retrieved 14 September 2026
- Pricing
BidX · Retrieved 14 September 2026
- Free campaign audit
BidX · Retrieved 14 September 2026